2007

Read it again, Lisa :

name me one distributor who does not sell glides because of the HR crap.

It does not say that it must be one of YOUR distributors, now does it? You were trying to make a point that HR would not effect MY distributor sale of glides, and that I was lying about that point. Well you are wrong, and there are many others besides this one, so you are WRONG> Not the first time either, but no big deal. I am getting used to it by now.

The other matter I wont comment on as it is still in the preparation phase. You will understand it soon enough.

Other than BP corporate, name me one distributor who does not sell glides because of the HR crap.


There have been many that have stopped selling the glides because of the HR problem Lisa, but since you asked for just ONE, I will give you one that is close to you.

Superduper over in Aneheim. Walter says he will not sell any till the litigation is over. Told me that last month. He used to be one of our largest accounts. He does not like your glides either. In fact, he let me know that many in the industry are thinking of sueing Greenglides over copyright infringement because of the way that you are using the company names without permission and adding them to your glides. Looks like you have more trouble coming your way soon. I could go on, because there are many others , but I made my point.


PS- Just in case some readers here think this is just one case of Lisa being proven wrong, and it is an exeption to the rule, it might be interesting to hear Lisa's response to my question to her 2 years ago when she was in the opening months of selling glides. I warned her that HR would come after Greenglides for infringing on the patents they hold. Here is her response to that warning:

They are leaving us alone Ken. I talked to them. The guy knows he's beat.


Opps!!!!!!!!!
    
     

Edited by Ken Harris - 01/January/2007 at 5:50pm

OK, Ken, time to BS yourself out of this one
    

Edited by cmaster - 01/January/2007 at 3:17pm

SGG said that himself?? He is not legally responsible for what he says??

1/666th

    Not whatever I say. Read what I wrote below. No mention of legal bills:



Not a question of if, only when Dennis. The problems with HR have cost me roughly $50,000/month in cashflow these last 40 months or so. I was counting on that money to launch the products you are referring to.I expect to have it back again by this coming Summer . That is when these products will be put into production.

I swear that you posted just a couple of days ago how you were spending $20,000 or was it $50,000 a month on legal fees. If that's true, you have already spent well over $100,000 in fees. What's the real story here?


You are wrong about that Paul. I was talking about what I lost in monthly sales on the Fullsize glides these last 39 months because of the despute with both HR and HF over the glides. I have spent almost nothing in legal bills since 2004 when Aqua-Max closed in June of that year.