Welcome to KleenKuip.com's Professional Carpet Cleaners Discussion Forum!

  
Carpet Cleaning Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Carpet Cleaners Discussion > Encapsulation, Very Low Moisture, Oscillating Pad Cleaning
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - OP versus CRB
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


Commercial Floor Cleaning Machines

OP versus CRB

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Chica View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 03/October/2009
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 21
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Chica Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: OP versus CRB
    Posted: 12/October/2009 at 9:35pm
Okay so I have spent a month reading up on everything I could find about VLM methods using OP and CRB machines as well as talking with various mfg's. Dead

So far this is what I have found so far:
-Initial machine cost is roughly about the same, and thus a wash
-Pad cost (in quantity) vs Brush cost is about equal per sq/ft, and thus a wash
-CRB's use sponge material that is tossed, Pads need to be changed/washed, sq/ft cost is about the same, and thus a wash
-Pad (in quantity) versus brush (set) lifetime seems to be equal, and thus a wash
-Various pads and brushes can be selected depending on application, and thus a wash
-Respective sq/ft/hr productivity is about the same, and thus a wash
-CRB machines lift pile better, CRB gets the nod
-CRB machines can be used to pre 'vac' (W&C renovator), CRB gets the nod

So far were pretty much equal with a few nods to CRB machines which leaves us with which machines actually clean better, those with actual experiance what say you?
Popcorn
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
Soil Lint Green View Drop Down
Carpet Cleaning Specialist
Carpet Cleaning Specialist
Avatar

Joined: 30/December/2007
Location: Oregon
Status: Offline
Points: 551
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Soil Lint Green Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12/October/2009 at 9:57pm
The IICRC takes no position on which method is better.

'IICRC S100 lists the standard steps included in each of 5 industry-accepted cleaning methods, based on the Principles of Cleaning. The 5 methods include: absorbent compound, absorbent pad, dry foam, shampoo, and “steam” cleaning. There is no attempt to compare methods or declare a “best method.” Rather the focus is on specifying standard steps that must be included in the proper use of each.'

OP, CRB and standard bonnet machines including floor machines using bonnets (my favorite) are as we all know just versions of the absorbent pad method.  Looks like you are sold on the CRB machines for what looks like good reasons.

Have you noticed 3 out of the 5 methods are basic VLM methods while the other two use lots of water, the one being the biggest self proclaimed winners of the water wars.

So how long have you had the CRB unit?  Who is the manufacturer?  What is the worse carpet you were able to make like new with it?  Any pics?  We love to share shots.  What chemicals do you use?  How do your customers feel about being able to use their carpet so soon?
It's ORY GUN, not OR A GONE. Learn to talk.
Back to Top
Chica View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 03/October/2009
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 21
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Chica Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17/October/2009 at 1:04pm
Okay someone out there has to have tried both methods and can offer up some sort of review... Dead
Back to Top
FuzzSucker View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 02/February/2008
Location: Lost and Found
Status: Offline
Points: 206
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FuzzSucker Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26/October/2009 at 12:06pm
Actually the IICRC's stance on the cleaning systems now, is that they recommend whatever the manufacturer of the carpet recommends. And the manufacturers do not currently recommend any system that uses a rotatory floor machine.Pad Cleaning They believe it causes to much pile distortion. Most of the manufacturers only recommend HWE. Only a couple recommend the drum brush style system for the commercial glue down only. Not the rotary systems. So basically the IICRC's stance is, use whatever you want, but you may be voiding a few warranties here and there. I'm not against using a rotary, I love mine for commercial, but its what the latest stance from IICRC is. By the way any rotary including RX20 or RV360 are included in the void the warranty category. 
Back to Top
Soil Lint Green View Drop Down
Carpet Cleaning Specialist
Carpet Cleaning Specialist
Avatar

Joined: 30/December/2007
Location: Oregon
Status: Offline
Points: 551
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Soil Lint Green Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27/October/2009 at 12:23am
The IICRC recognizes, does not recommend.  And what it recognizes are three low moisture, two high moisture systems.  60% of the recognized methods (the majority) are Very Low Moisture of one kind or another.

Of course we are all professionals, we decide what is the best method for the carpet in its current condition.  That or we all do the carpet mill's bidding and think within the box.  I believe that experience has taught us all well to think outside the box and trust our instinct derived from personal experiences.

Right?
It's ORY GUN, not OR A GONE. Learn to talk.
Back to Top
FuzzSucker View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 02/February/2008
Location: Lost and Found
Status: Offline
Points: 206
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FuzzSucker Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28/October/2009 at 12:51am
I agree. I carry equipment to do bonnet, shampoo and hwe. I'm just mentioning that is the current standard. 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.06
Copyright ©2001-2023 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.359 seconds.